The Sindh Service Tribunal in Karachi hears appeals by civil servants of the Province of Sindh about the terms and conditions of their service. For most provincial employees, including police officers and teachers, it is the forum where a dismissal, removal, reduction in rank or pay dispute is finally tested. MSA Law Chamber prepares and argues service appeals before the Tribunal, and advises on the departmental stage that must come first.
What the Sindh Service Tribunal does
The Tribunal is constituted under the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973. Under Article 212 of the Constitution, matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants are within the jurisdiction of service tribunals, and ordinary courts generally cannot hear them. A civil servant aggrieved by a final order, whether original or appellate, can appeal to the Tribunal under section 4 of the Act. The Tribunal can confirm, set aside, vary or modify the order. In practice that can mean reinstatement, back benefits, restoration of rank or pay, or a direction to decide a promotion within a fixed time.
Before you appeal: the departmental remedy
Where the rules provide a departmental appeal, review or representation, it generally has to be filed first, and within the time allowed. In Muhammad Aslam (811/2021) the Tribunal held a service appeal not maintainable because the departmental appeal had been filed late, so the departmental remedy had not been properly exhausted.
Time limits
A service appeal generally has to be filed within 30 days of the departmental decision. If the department does not decide the departmental appeal, section 4(a) of the Act allows a service appeal once 90 days have passed from filing it, so there is no need to wait indefinitely. Three decisions in our own files show how strictly these limits are applied:
- In Majida (24/2025), a second departmental appeal to the Chief Secretary did not extend time.
- In Aqib Khan Jadoon (389/2025), a delay of over six years was not condoned without medical proof covering the whole period.
- In Aqib Khalid (06/2024) and Zahid Saleem (115/2024), an acquittal gave a fresh cause of action, and fresh appeals filed promptly after acquittal were held within time.
Grounds the Tribunal has accepted
Every appeal turns on its own record, but the judgments below show the kinds of points the Tribunal examines:
- Regular inquiry wrongly dispensed with. Where facts were disputed and the department gave only a formula reason for skipping an inquiry, a dismissal was set aside (Muzammil Shah, 541/2022).
- Acquittal from the only charge. Where a dismissal or discharge rested only on a criminal case ending in acquittal, reinstatement was ordered (Zahid Saleem; Aqib Khalid).
- Penalty without a stated period. A reduction in rank with no stated period was limited to three years, with restoration of rank afterwards (Khalid Pervaiz Joya, 876/2019).
- Long temporary promotion. An employee who served on a higher post for about 22 years was held entitled to its pay, with promotion to be decided within four months (Kashif Naseem, 77/2022).
Sindh Service Tribunal judgments in appeals we handled
Each summary below links to a plain-English write-up and the full judgment as a PDF, with personal details redacted. Outcomes include appeals allowed, partly allowed and dismissed.
-
Aqib Khalid v. Inspector General of Police & others (Execution)
Execution Application No. 61 of 2025 in Service Appeal No. 06 of 2024 · 6 March 2026
Outcome: Judgment of 17 March 2025 held not yet satisfied. Respondents directed to comply in letter and spirit and to pay back benefits from 05.01.2018 to 24.04.2025.
-
Aqib Khan Jadoon v. Additional Inspector General of Police, Karachi Range & others
Service Appeal No. 389 of 2025 · 17 November 2025
Outcome: Appeal dismissed in limine as time-barred; condonation of delay refused.
-
Muzammil Shah v. Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Karachi & another
Service Appeal No. 541 of 2022 · 29 April 2025
Outcome: Appeal allowed. Dismissal and appellate orders set aside; reinstated with full back benefits.
-
Majida v. Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh & another
Service Appeal No. 24 of 2025 · 24 April 2025
Outcome: Appeal dismissed in limine as time-barred; condonation of delay refused.
-
Aqib Khalid v. Inspector General of Police & others
Service Appeal No. 06 of 2024 · 17 March 2025
Outcome: Appeal allowed. Discharge order and appellate order set aside; reinstated with back benefits, out-of-service period treated as leave of the kind due.
-
Muhammad Aslam v. Inspector General of Police, Sindh & others
Service Appeal No. 811 of 2021 · 25 February 2025
Outcome: Appeal dismissed as not maintainable; no order as to costs.
-
Khalid Pervaiz Joya v. Inspector General of Police, Sindh & others
Service Appeal Nos. 876 & 877 of 2019 · 29 October 2024
Outcome: Appeal No. 877 dismissed. Appeal No. 876 partly allowed: reduction in rank fixed at three years; restored to substantive rank from 12.12.2020 with consequential benefits.
-
Kashif Naseem v. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others
Service Appeal No. 77 of 2022 · 16 October 2024
Outcome: Appeal partly allowed. Entitled to higher pay and related benefits; promotion process to be completed within four months.
-
Zahid Saleem v. Inspector General of Police, Sindh & others
Service Appeal No. 115 of 2024 · 18 September 2024
Outcome: Appeal allowed. Dismissal set aside; reinstated with back benefits if not gainfully employed elsewhere.
How we prepare a service appeal
- Check status and datesWe confirm you are a civil servant within the Tribunal's jurisdiction and work out the limitation dates from the orders.
- Collect the recordWe gather the show-cause notice, inquiry papers, final and appellate orders, and any criminal case judgment.
- Draft the memo of appealWe set out the facts, the rules relied on and the relief sought, with an application for condonation of delay only where it is genuinely needed.
- Hearing and implementationWe argue the appeal and, after a decision in your favour, follow up on reinstatement, arrears and compliance.
Frequently asked questions
A civil servant of the Province of Sindh who is aggrieved by a final order about the terms and conditions of service, after availing any departmental appeal or representation the rules provide. Police officers and government teachers are among those who regularly appeal to the Tribunal.
Generally 30 days from the departmental decision. If the departmental appeal is not decided, a service appeal can be filed once 90 days have passed from filing it. A second departmental appeal does not extend time.
Yes. In Muzammil Shah (541/2022) and Aqib Khalid (06/2024), for example, the Tribunal set aside the orders and reinstated the appellants with back benefits. Whether back benefits are granted depends on the facts.
A decision of the Sindh Service Tribunal can be taken to the Supreme Court of Pakistan only by leave to appeal under Article 212(3) of the Constitution, on a substantial question of law of public importance.
Planning a Sindh Service Tribunal appeal?
Speak to our service law advocates before the time limit runs out. Call or WhatsApp +92 308 2254647 (Monday to Saturday, 11:00 am to 7:30 pm), or send an enquiry through our contact page.
This page is general information about service law in Sindh and our practice. It is not legal advice. Laws, rules and time limits change and depend on your status and the order involved; please take advice on your specific facts. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any other matter.